Sex Books Torrents
As a feminist I jumped to about policies (eg Manuel Valls, PS, and the "torrent of mud, shit," source here) while the right to power slowly unravels the public service, precarious work, with a particular harm to women. Fortunately there are some new life into feminist associations, a huge sick and tired of women, girls who come to channel their energy! This is a question I have long asked – or rather, for my part I thought all resolved: Adam and Eve they had sex in Paradise? I remember already seminar conversation on this point. As qu'aristotélicien somewhat limited, I could not see how, having received the kit staffing, our first parents did it would not be served. What harm was there in that? And at that moment, the Thomist took the baton: God created us good in all the natural functions which are those of the human animal. What is bad is not sexuality, but the use made of it. Nothing short of classic. But then, it seems that this view goes against the "torrent of doctors", to quote a little haughty Gaetani, doctors who, for the most part, take the opposite view. Adam and Eve would have discovered that when their organs, according to the text of Genesis, "their eyes were opened" and when "knowing that they were naked," they have made themselves loincloths leaves of fig. In this case, we should say that sexuality is always linked to sin. I do not want me to sing with the choir of safe sex and good sexual awareness universal. No! I believe that sexual desire is inherently narcissistic in its deployment (as Freud explained well by the way) and that narcissism is a universal figure of sin. I am prepared to concede the torrent Freud doctors. But it seems you can never link sexuality with sin (even at the original sin) so essential. Or should blame God? We must therefore say that sexuality is essentially orderly good in that it binds man to woman and woman to man the will of God, we are far from Freudian narcissism!. But so far, I only had a philosophical and theological arguments. In preparing my sermon for Lent tomorrow, I came across a while ago on a scriptural argument which I think is crucial for my thesis. It is developed by Daniel Lys in the Garden of Eden (ed. Cerf 1992). I'm telling you right away. In chapter 4 verse 1 we read: "Now the man had known his wife Eve and she conceived ..". Comment by D. Lily: "The importance of grammar and syntax! They require a more-than-perfect [had been] rather than a simple past [knew]." Eve has been driven out of Paradise pregnant .. I reassure those concerned about the doctors. Gregory of Nyssa, for its part, wants absolutely chaste Adam and Eve in paradise. St. Augustine has evolved on this subject and in Book IX of De Genesi ad litteram, he said that sex would have existed in heaven, "tumult" and less. He writes: "Why do not we believe that these early humans before the fall, could command the organs of generation to procreate children, as they ordered the other members that the soul moves without hindrance and without pruritus fun to apply for any job? " (IX, 18. See IX, 3). In Book XI, 3 he says: "Death once conceived in the body of humans disobedient, for a very fair return, members raised the tumult of disobedient" is disobedience to the square of sorts. The dance of Eros and Thanatos can begin! What tumult indeed!. That's all that – and many other things that I will tomorrow Sunday at 18 pm at St. Paul for the first preaching of Lent on "Evil as it was revealed at the beginning of the Book ". Subject: Original sin is it a sexual sin? Mass is celebrated as usual at 19 H. Vespers are at 17 H. One can not imagine the Garden TODAY, WHEN SEX mixes with politics, the stigma is the most likely outcome. It is thought photo abdomen, following the Sofitel, airport toilets, stain on a blue dress. Sex, and compulsive considered indecent, is a sign of a defective personality: ordeal, greedy, delusional and hypocritical. It is difficult, perhaps, to remember that sex was a day in the ideal continuation of a radical politics by other means. In designing the formula of "sexual revolution", Wilhelm Reich meant transforming all areas: health, marriage, economics, morality and government. It was in sex, he thought, we guessed integrated individuality, free from a culture of alienation and an authoritarian state. Christopher Turner's book, Adventures in the Orgasmatron ("Adventures in the Orgasmatron"), states, in part, past where sex was the promise of social reform. Its sub-title might be How the Sexual Revolution Came to America ("How the sexual revolution arrived in America"), his book is generally a gender-focused biography of Reich, the great proselytizer of orgasm. Because he believed in the orgone, an imaginary form of energy, Reich is now subject to ridicule (the Orgasmatron is the name of the cartoon is that Woody Allen in Sleeper, accumulator Reich's orgone, a metal and plywood the size of a phone booth, which is supposed to contain a therapeutic and revitalizing force). But Reich is also a fascinating and unjustly forgotten. If he had stopped there, we may recall today of its chief early work, Character Analysis, a book that changed forever how to do psychotherapy. It is then, in a crazy and confused, he made the dream of a company saved by sex. At the end of the Great War, Reich, 22 years and a medical student strikes to 19 of Berggasse to ask for references to Freud. It becomes his protégé. By the mid-1920s, Reich leads the technical seminar to the Vienna Society of Psychoanalysis. His contribution is summarized in a precept taught to generations of psychoanalysts: the character before interpreting its contents. Reich observed that his patients, Freud dedicated, may share some memories of the primal scene but generally conceal feelings of shame in torrents of speech. Reich concludes that it must deal, in his words, "the character armor." Stubbornly, Reich brave patients and their apparent cooperation, which he sees as a tactic to sabotage the change. Fritz Perls, founder of Gestalt therapy, Reich was "sly and brutal." But one of his patients, quoted by Turner, clinical engineering Reich is as follows:. "Its ability to detect the slightest movement, the slightest inflection of the voice, the most subtle change in expression, was out of proportion .. Day after day, week after week, he sought to draw attention to a patient on an attitude, a tension in his facial expression, until he feels and understands what it meant.. " Freud realized that he supported a rival whose project was to put the analysis on its head. In 1926, he interrupted a speech by Reich argues: "We must clearly analyze and interpret the dreams of incest as they emerge." For Freud, and his interest in the slip, the words were the main means of expression of mind. But intonation is material, it also coincides with the report dreamlike. The general public has come to adopt the opinion of Reich, to see the behavior of a patient as something as relevant as his words. With Reich, defense mechanisms, narcissism, passive aggression, etc. .- went to the front. Psychoanalysis has been directed to other concepts (empathy, in particular), but the way Freudian therapy takes place today is more than Freud Reich. When asked what it defends itself against, or what is repressed, the answer, according to classical psychoanalysis always involves sex. But what to do with sex, nothing is certain. By abandoning his faith initial orgasm, Freud conceived a theory providing a degree of frustration of sexual energy, which can then be channeled into creativity. By joining the first Freudian thought that was a vector of sexual health, the thought of Reich became monumental (Turner, citing Reich's daughter, Lore, aims to show that, from the beginning, it was clear that his father was manic-depressive, "Can we still doubt it?"). Thus Reich drew up grandiose plans to reform culture through sex education. Merging abandoned versions of Freudianism and Marxism, Reich began to see in the repression and neurosis causes and consequences of bourgeois private property and patriarchy. It opens in clinics free sex, while promoting orgasm and communism in surveying the city aboard a van. The term ostensible libido, which started from the free love between teenagers, would enable the development of the proletarian political consciousness. Soon, Reich was expelled from the analytic movement and the Communist Party. Reich had many admirers among the young analysts and the avant-garde literary and artistic. At a rally Reichian in 1930, near a lake, a kindly observer described the thing as a "passion for exhibitionism and voyeurism of love stories semi-public. Promiscuity was staged there, we gave parties and bawdy theater, and was bathing naked. " As Turner shows then this idealization of sex also victims. Reich begins with a couple old patient, who died a few months after the start of their adventure, probably as the result of a missed abortion. Reich relies on quickly and then get married, to divorce, with another woman, Annie Pink, Annie Reich future (it prevented him from seeing his children, fearing abuse). This habit of having sex with his patients, his students and his cohorts-often disastrous for women, never left Reich. Sexual vigor is an ideal on which it is easy to agree. Fascist Reich had thought, this has not prevented some branches of Nazism to support his theories. Turner cites a sex education manual endorsed by the NSDAP, which encouraged "masturbation of children and adolescents and extramarital affairs, calling young women to free themselves from the shackles of repression to enjoy the" vibrant humanity "which was intended." The quest for orgasmic power justified the extermination of the disabled and homosexuals. Like capitalism: Herbert Marcuse presaged that sex is easily trivialized and become a commodity trading system integrated into a production and mass consumption. After the Reich immigration to the United States in 1939, Turner's presentation takes on a picaresque recounting of the rise of a madman. Reich then clearly suffers from a serious mental illness with mood swings and delusions of persecution, and shady characters, including child rapists, are part of his inner circle. But still, in the postwar era and dull conformity, Reich became a hero of the cons-culture, embodying as much sexual license that existential authenticity. Paul Goodman, later known for his book Growing Up Absurd (Direction absurd) familiarize the general public, to the writings of Reich, which he said were "the psychology of revolution." Via Reich, Goodman popularized a philosophy that would find its heyday in the 1960s. Reich promised Goodman congratulated himself: it was present at the end of the inhibitions of the people, about to recover his "sexual health and animal spirits" through apocalyptic orgasm, the first condition of sexual bliss that was push not to "tolerate mechanical work and routine to be preferred (no matter the inconvenience public) spontaneous activities and truly significant." For Turner, Reich in America all of a character in Zelig, appearing sneak into the lives of many writers. Saul Bellow is and build an accumulator and believes he has cured his warts and his breathing improved. Whether J. D. Salinger, Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac and William Burroughs, all claim to have stayed in the orgone box to absorb vibrations. Ginsberg wrote to Reich for an appointment, but Reich refused to treat homosexuals. Mailer had endorsed the idea of an orgasm character, worked, but much later confessed to Turner as "apocalyptic orgasm had always escaped." As for how subsidies have accumulated Reich, Turner prefers romantic cynicism. He understands that managing a company has always sought to limit the autonomy that sexual liberation has an ambiguous relationship with political freedom and the radical organizations, much less radical individuals tend to think outside the box. The precocity and productivity of Reich, his support for the ideals attractive and his strange charisma allowed him to enjoy a credibility that persists long after the time of his grotesque delusions take precedence over his thoughts. It is via the Mailer theme of Turner is the most obvious: "For me, the important thing was the strength, clarity and power of the early writings [Reich], and daring. And because I also think that in a very basic sense, he was right.. " What about this basic sense? It seems that our relationship to sex has always been a bit tense. Culturally speaking, we do not take sex seriously enough, but we do not sufficiently take lightly. Such a sexual ideal is difficult to define. Sex should be fun, deep, creative, caring, insensitive, sublime, Land-apocalyptic? The list of ideals that we can not meet is as endless as contradictory. And as we suggested in our sex-scandals politco, it is difficult to escape the sex of their status objectionable. No need to be an evolutionary psychologist to understand that, since the robbery and infidelity are sometimes adaptive reproductive strategies, strength and transgression are likely to be challenging for a long time, regardless of social context. Sex may still remain problematic. However, we have not totally failed in the second half of the twentieth century, to move with sex, even if Reich did not win. Women can now defend their erotic inclinations, whether positively or negatively. We are coming increasingly to isolate the sex of pregnancy which, overall, is a blessing. We can talk more frankly, and just about everywhere. The technique is transmitted to the point. At least, these are truths that apply to the privileged. In Saving the Modern Soul ("Saving the modern soul"), the sociologist Eval Illouz describes what she calls emotional stratification. She says passage of the New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis, Freud compares the daughter of the warden who lives in the basement, has many sexual adventures, enjoys a successful career blossomed, and, to the owner -living in the story is formed ideals of abstinence, falls in neurosis and stagnant. Today, as Illouz observed, it is the story of people who are trained to become socially and sexually competent. In his book of interviews, members of the working class are more likely, compared to more affluent classes, sorry for the poor communication and marital romantic relationships failed. Illouz reading, and Turner, I thought about the legacy of Reich. His legacy is found largely on Oprah Winfrey, and the dissemination plethora of advice on privacy and personal development. The culture of confession did not lead to political nirvana but we can see a link, and this is my case between investment for Oprah emotional cohesion, its success and the election of Obama, an man knowing full well organize a community, a conciliator and a very subtle memorialist, as President of the United States. This link between personal conscience and political awareness is more disciplined and more light than anything that Reich could have imagined, but here, perhaps, we distinguish the mark of his influence. Wilhelm Reich never spoke of orgasm "apocalyptic". Of serious studies led him to discover that sex was not intended procreation but the relief of tension accumulated in the body, procreation being a side effect. His subsequent discovery of biological energy (orgone) was also preceded by lengthy observations before Reich not draw the obvious conclusions. Reich was actually somewhat mentally disturbed, but this state has occurred as a result of contact with the nuclear material, during a bad experience (ORANUR) in 1951, where he tried to neutralize the effects radioctifs threat of nuclear war possible. Readers interested in the work and the discoveries of Wilhelm Reich profitably read his own works: "The function of the orgasm", "the biopathie cancer" and "Cosmic Superimposition". A serious controversy and detailed all of his work is on the site Roger Wilcox (typing on Google). The reader will be able to form their own opinion. Dr. Kramer rightly acknowledges the debt of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in general with respect to Reich and his work on the analysis of character. But Kramer says that is as significant as what we hide or do not know. It does not tell us that the rumor of a "serious mental illness" in Reich was launched by some analysts as early as 30, that psychiatrists were trying to discredit Reich as well as their medical colleagues orgonomic through sexual slander, and until many years after the death of Reich, Professors of Psychiatry will even threaten excluding students who would mention his name. Reich's case is rare in that it is a respected psychiatrist whose mental health was formally examined by a medical committee, and it is certainly unique when you consider the fact that, despite the diagnosis Mental Health established by the commission, we continue to systematically present Reich as a mental patient – schizophrenic, manic, paranoid, psychotic diagnoses vary … the personal attitude of psychologists that issue. – The phrase "great proselytizer of orgasm" is a journalistic level through a tabloid – let us remember that this is merely a scholar who has attempted to study the orgasm as a natural phenomenon . But it seems absurd to Dr. Kramer, busy he is with his fine cultural analysis. – As for the various biographical details, it is easy to concoct a partial submission as to be distorted. There are many personal accounts that give Reich a very different picture from that provided by Tuner and Kramer. – It is not true that Reich refused to treat homosexuals (see eg. The testimony of Professor Morton Herskowitz). As for Allen Ginsberg, he was seen by a student of Reich, Dr. Allan Cott, who, however, eventually return to the patient's refusal to stop using marijuana. Finally, we can ask the question of motivation, conscious or unconscious, of the survey where a history of the Beat generation and through the sexual revolution in general becomes an attempt to discredit Reich. Reich was in fact a "puritan" because he continued to distinguish between primary drives (natural) and secondary (distorted, perverse, antisocial). That so-called sex books torrents followers are missed this distinction in no way disproves central work of Reich. Had he not provided the through the "enjoy without hindrance," he wrote in 1953 in "The Murder of Christ" that "the main danger is the introduction of a pernicious philosophy derived from the 'orgastic potency' who advocate sexual license in any place and at any time. Similar to the arrow leaving the stretched spring that held it, the pursuit of pleasure genital fast, convenient and harmful will wreak havoc in the human community. ". Highlight of his trip to Germany, the Pope before the Bundestag has hammered the imperatives of law and protection of nature in political action. Six people were killed, dozens injured and at least 29 are still missing after the sinking of the Costa Concordia, a boat ..