Chemistry Books
Je n Here you can find a good part of my original trabajos.Cuadros I do mine and versions of the great masters of the pintura.Me like to explore all styles of painting, some better than others, but all get the same interest, each work is for me a new challenge to face. To facilitate viewing of the blog and not get too long, the tables are classified by temas.Pinchando in the pictures below you will see the works of each gallery and technical measures I have used. If you are interested in any of the available frames, a new version of one of those who have painted, or any idea you want to have captured on canvas, learn without compromiso.Envíos throughout Spain and abroad. It was the other day with some readers when someone refers to these leaflets Sunday, made my hair stand on end. Tucked away in a corner was how I found this book as if it were a treasure was hidden away from the first look of someone who looks at that table full of literature, knowledge and dreams. It was there on a sunny Sunday morning walking down the Cuesta Moyano de Madrid where he could hunt like prey. The letters Chechnya were the first I could distinguish, and certainly that made me grab one of dozens of coordination chemistry books that were at his side. Everyone knows that many times it is not we who find them, but the books themselves are who we are. My surprise was to recognize the author's name: Juan Goytisolo. Years ago I had the pleasure of reading an extraordinary book The Russian prime minister and candidate for President of the country for United Russia, Vladimir Putin, has published a lengthy article in which he outlined his vision of the ethnic issue in Russia, and how he sees the resolution of problems associated with this item. Below, we reproduce the full text of the publication. For Russia, with its variety of languages, traditions, ethnic and cultural groups, the ethnic problem, without exaggeration, it is essential. Any responsible politician or public servant should be aware that one of the main conditions for the existence of our country rests on consensus among its citizens and ethnic groups. We see what is happening in the world, we see the potential risks. The reality today is marked by tension between nationalities and creeds. Nationalism, religious intolerance has become the ideological base of groups and radical currents, which destroy, deteriorate and separate states of society. The large-scale migration, by the way it appears to continue to rise, it is called by many "the great migration of peoples', able to change the usual order and appearance of whole continents. Millions of people seeking a better life leave their land to escape hunger, endless conflicts, poverty and social chaos. The worsening of the ethnic problem has directly affected the most developed countries, who previously prided themselves on their tolerance. Today one after another announced the failure of their attempts to integrate into society individuals of other cultures, and provide a peaceful and harmonious integration of different religious, ethnic or cultural groups. The 'melting pot' of integration sizzling and wrong, and is not able to 'digest' the growing large-scale influx. This is reflected in politics through 'multiculturalism', which denies the integration through assimilation. This raises without measure the 'right to difference of minorities', creating an imbalance between the rights and obligations of civil, cultural and behavior in relation to the native population and society in general. In many countries there are very closed ethnic and religious communities, not only refuse to be assimilated, but did not even try to adapt. They are known neighborhoods, and even entire cities, where generations of immigrants live in social benefits without even speaking the language of the host country. The reaction in response to these behaviors is the rise of xenophobia among the natives and attempted by force to defend their interests, jobs and social welfare of the 'competition of outsiders'. People are puzzled by the mistreatment of their traditions, lifestyle and certainly fear the threat of losing their national identity. European political figures start talking reputation of the failure of 'multicultural project'. To preserve its status, abuse of 'ethnic map' passing into the realm of those who previously qualified as marginal or radical. Extremist forces, meanwhile, strengthened exponentially, seriously intending to take state power. In fact conduct a dialogue is offered to impose assimilation, but with an undercurrent of isolation and severe tightening of migration regimes. The members of another culture should "dissolve the masses' or stay as ethnic minorities, albeit with certain rights and guarantees. This is actually being excluded from the possibility of a successful career. I'll say it directly: the citizen as in these conditions is difficult to expect loyalty to his country. Behind the 'multicultural project failure' is the crisis of the model itself, called 'ethnic state', a state historically formed on the basis of ethnic identity. And this is a great challenge which would face Europe and many other regions. Despite the apparent similarity, our situation is completely different. Our ethnic and immigration issues are directly linked to the collapse of the Soviet Union and, historically, the great Russia, relegated to its foundations in the eighteenth century. This accompanied by the inevitable degradation of social institutions, economic and state and a giant gap in the scene post-Soviet development. By declaring sovereignty 20 years ago, the then members of the RSFSR (Soviet Federative Socialist Republic of Russia), in a struggle with the 'center of the union,' launched the process of creating 'ethnic states' even within the Russian Federation itself. The 'center of the union', in turn, in an attempt to pressure their opponents began to plot a game behind the scenes with Russian autonomies, promising an increase in status 'etnoestatal'. Now the participants in these processes are blaming each other. But it is obvious that their actions led equally to the disorganization and separatism. They had neither the manhood and responsibility and political will to consistently defend the territorial integrity of the motherland. This fact, which perhaps did not realize the promoters of the 'waste of sovereignty', was perceived by everyone else, including the international community, thus ensuring that the consequences are not kept waiting. With the disintegration of the country, were on the brink and in certain regions were on the verge of civil war, just on ethnic grounds. It took a tremendous poise and a great sacrifice to neutralize these foci, but this just does not mean that the problem is resolved. However, even in those moments when the state as an institution was critically weakened, Russia did not disappear. It happened just that Vasili said Kliuchevski